by Likiweaks
We obviously support all Wikileaks and its founder and spokesman Julian Assange which, in this dirty war in the world by States against transparency and openness, has been arrested in Great Britain.
But in the world of politics, things are unfortunately never as innocent as they seemed. Following new revelations before the last "cable gate" Assange have concluded an agreement with Israel that could explain why, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, leaks were "good for Israel. "
Some commentators, particularly in Turkey and Russia, are asking why the hundreds of thousands of confidential documents disclosed by the site last month does not contain anything that could embarrass the Israeli government, like almost all other states to which refer to the documents.
The answer seems to be a secret agreement concluded between the "heart and soul" of Wikileaks, as was once Assange humbly describes himself (1), and Israeli officials, who ensured that all these documents would be "removed" before the other made public.
But in the world of politics, things are unfortunately never as innocent as they seemed. Following new revelations before the last "cable gate" Assange have concluded an agreement with Israel that could explain why, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, leaks were "good for Israel. "
Some commentators, particularly in Turkey and Russia, are asking why the hundreds of thousands of confidential documents disclosed by the site last month does not contain anything that could embarrass the Israeli government, like almost all other states to which refer to the documents.
The answer seems to be a secret agreement concluded between the "heart and soul" of Wikileaks, as was once Assange humbly describes himself (1), and Israeli officials, who ensured that all these documents would be "removed" before the other made public.
According to Arab website investigative journalism (2), Al-Haqiqa (truth), Assange received money from semi-official Israeli sources, and when a secret arrangement recorded on video, has promised not to publish any document that can affect the safety or diplomatic interests of Israel.
sources said the article in Al-Haqiqa, in the last few months, before the "autocratic leadership" and "lack of transparency" of Assange, former volunteers have left the organization Wikileaks.
During a recent interview with the German daily Die Tageszeitung, the former spokesman Daniel Domscheit Wikileaks-Berg said he and other dissidents Wikileaks preparing to launch their own gallery of disclosure to achieve the original purpose of Wikileaks, file sharing limitless. (3) Mr.
Domscheit-Berg, who is about to publish a book about her life "within Wikileaks," Assange accused of acting like a "king" against the wishes of other members, to media organizations with the agreements aimed at creating an explosive effect, which Wikileaks others know virtually nothing or nothing at all. (4)
sources said the article in Al-Haqiqa, in the last few months, before the "autocratic leadership" and "lack of transparency" of Assange, former volunteers have left the organization Wikileaks.
During a recent interview with the German daily Die Tageszeitung, the former spokesman Daniel Domscheit Wikileaks-Berg said he and other dissidents Wikileaks preparing to launch their own gallery of disclosure to achieve the original purpose of Wikileaks, file sharing limitless. (3) Mr.
Domscheit-Berg, who is about to publish a book about her life "within Wikileaks," Assange accused of acting like a "king" against the wishes of other members, to media organizations with the agreements aimed at creating an explosive effect, which Wikileaks others know virtually nothing or nothing at all. (4)
Moreover, insiders add that the interest of the scoops to Assange headlines to mean that Wikileaks is unable to "restructure" to handle de nouveaux intérêts particuliers. C’est-à-dire que de petites fuites pouvant avoir de l'intérêt pour des gens à un niveau local, sont actuellement négligées par égard aux grosses affaires. (5)
Selon les sources d’Al-Haqiqa, Assange a rencontré des responsables israéliens à Genève plus tôt cette année et a conclu le pacte secret. Le gouvernement d'Israël a semble-t-il en quelque sorte découvert ou s'attendait à ce que soient ébruités un grand nombre de documents concernant les attaques israéliennes au Liban et à Gaza, respectivement en 2006 et 2008-9. Les sources ont ajouté que ces documents, qui provenaient said to be mainly U.S. embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut have been removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, the only person who knows the password to open them.
Indeed, the documents appear to have published a "void", covering the period from July to September 2006, which took place during the 33-day war in Lebanon.
Is it possible that, just passing their time in "chatter" on virtually all other Middle East issues irrelevant, diplomats and officials zuniens (U.S.) have any comments or information exchanged on this crucial event?
Following the leak (and even before), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had "taken the lead" to limit the damage caused by leaks, adding that "No Israeli confidential document has been revealed by Wikileaks. "(6) At the same time, in an interview for Time magazine, with Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness, Assange praised him! (7)
In another article (8), a Lebanese newspaper trend left Assange met twice. Offering "a large sum of money," he tried to negotiate a contract with him to obtain documents relating to the 2006 war, particularly the minutes of a meeting held at the embassy in Beirut zunienne July 24, 2006. This meeting is widely regarded as a "council of war" between the Israeli, Lebanese and zuniennes who played a role in the war against Hezbollah and its allies.
However, sources confirm that the documents received by the journalists of Al-Akhbar on each day of 2008 and after, do not contain nothing of value. All this does buttress the allegations of an agreement with Israel.
Finally, it might be useful to note qu'Assange could do what he says he did to protect and ensure the disclosure of documents so as to expose the hypocrisy zunienne, which he said obsessed, "the expense of more fundamental objectives. "
Selon les sources d’Al-Haqiqa, Assange a rencontré des responsables israéliens à Genève plus tôt cette année et a conclu le pacte secret. Le gouvernement d'Israël a semble-t-il en quelque sorte découvert ou s'attendait à ce que soient ébruités un grand nombre de documents concernant les attaques israéliennes au Liban et à Gaza, respectivement en 2006 et 2008-9. Les sources ont ajouté que ces documents, qui provenaient said to be mainly U.S. embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut have been removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, the only person who knows the password to open them.
Indeed, the documents appear to have published a "void", covering the period from July to September 2006, which took place during the 33-day war in Lebanon.
Is it possible that, just passing their time in "chatter" on virtually all other Middle East issues irrelevant, diplomats and officials zuniens (U.S.) have any comments or information exchanged on this crucial event?
Following the leak (and even before), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had "taken the lead" to limit the damage caused by leaks, adding that "No Israeli confidential document has been revealed by Wikileaks. "(6) At the same time, in an interview for Time magazine, with Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness, Assange praised him! (7)
In another article (8), a Lebanese newspaper trend left Assange met twice. Offering "a large sum of money," he tried to negotiate a contract with him to obtain documents relating to the 2006 war, particularly the minutes of a meeting held at the embassy in Beirut zunienne July 24, 2006. This meeting is widely regarded as a "council of war" between the Israeli, Lebanese and zuniennes who played a role in the war against Hezbollah and its allies.
However, sources confirm that the documents received by the journalists of Al-Akhbar on each day of 2008 and after, do not contain nothing of value. All this does buttress the allegations of an agreement with Israel.
Finally, it might be useful to note qu'Assange could do what he says he did to protect and ensure the disclosure of documents so as to expose the hypocrisy zunienne, which he said obsessed, "the expense of more fundamental objectives. "
Notes
1) www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/09/wikileaks-revolt/ (unpublished notes on the war in Iraq has triggered an internal revolt from Wikileaks) 2) www.syriatruth. info/content/view/977/36 / (Domscheit According to Daniel Berg, Assange promised the Israelis do not publish their own documents) 3) www.taz.de/1/netz/netzpolitik/artikel/ 1/vom-hacker-zum-popstar / (Originally Wilileaks wanted to put as much information as possible available to the public, it has become now a very powerful censor) 4) www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0, 1518,732212,00. html (Former militants are launching a new website Wikileaks disclosure) 5) www.spiegel.de / International / germany / 0,1518,719619,00. html (The Wikileaks spokesman resigns: Only option for me, a start in the calm) 6) www.haaretz.com / print-edition / news / wikileaks-Netanyahu-revelations-Were-good-for-israel-1.327773 (According to Netanyahu, the revelations of Wikileaks have been good for Israel ... Iran threatens the world, as confirmed by King Abdullah of Saudi ... unlike Arabia the claims of 60 years of propaganda presenting Israel as the greatest threat ... Netanyahu said Israel had taken the lead in limiting damage caused by leaks ...) 7) www.time.com/time/world/article/0 ,8599,2034040-2, 00.html 8) www.syriatruth.info/content/view/986/36/ Original: Wikileaks 'Struck Deal With Israel' over leaks cables diplomacy, December 7, 2010. Translation: Pétrus Lombard | |
articles published by Likiweaks Mondialisation.ca |